Documentation
Introduction
It is important to realise that not all documents will support the theories and evidence on this website. In fact many have been produced by what we refer to as complicit organisations such as certain universities involved in the program and so-called scientific bodies such as the IPCC The Royal Society and the MET Office. A few people have accused us of hypocrisy or inaccuracy because a document in this section contradicts something we claim. We have not written most of them and simply provide you with a simple and easy place to access all relevant information, both for and against.
One of the most important claims of this website is that a vast array of disinformation is available online, from both official and unofficial sources, so the fact that some of these documents contradicts what we say is to be expected. We are not scared to show you some of those items because we feel it is important for you to realise that they exists and why, and also because none of them stand up to scrutiny and so, if the reader takes the time to investigate fully, they actually bolster our case. There are only really 3 reasons why a faked documents are produced – to try to mislead people, hide something or undermine genuine information, all of which amount to the same thing.
The reason they are produced by complicit organisations, and in turn are harmful to our campaign, is because it is human nature for the average person to accept what they are told from official sources without question. Sadly this will always be an obstacle we face, and though not insurmountable in the long run, it makes life very difficult for us, even when we manage to undermine those efforts conclusively. In the mean time please use your intuition rather than simply discounting things because some government scientist told you to do so.
We will hopefully, in due course, analyse all the documents individually in the evidence section and clarify what we think about the information they contain. If we regards it as disinformation we will explain why and present any evidence to prove it if available.
Please do scrutinise them and feed back to us if you discover anything significant. It may be the case that flaws in our theories and evidence may be discovered, or on the other had, valuable evidence in our favour may come to light, as has been the case in some examples.
There is only limited content here so far, but lots more in the way as and when we can.
Feel free to download anything though please be aware that some content is from 3rd parties and may be subject to copyright restrictions.
You will need to have Adobe Reader installed to open these documents
Laboratory results
Human Tissue and Rain – Lab Tests 1
General
Scientific
A21
Intelligence and counter intelligence
full-spectrum-cyber-effects-final
Organized and Professional Disinformation Operations (Autosaved)
SRMGI
Wednesday-Plenary-Thought-Experiment-2
Wednesday-Introduction-Thought-Experiment-1
Wednesday-Breakout-4-Thought-Experiment-2
Wednesday-Breakout-4-Thought-Experiment-1
Wednesday-Breakout-3-Thought-Experiment-2
Wednesday-Breakout-3-Thought-Experiment-1
Wednesday-Breakout-2-Thought-Experiment-2
Wednesday-Breakout-2-Thought-Experiment-1
Wednesday-Breakout-1-Thought-Experiment-2
Wednesday-Breakout-1-Thought-Experiment-1
Tuesday-Plenary-Goals-Concerns-and-Principles
Tuesday-Plenary-Discussion-Thresholds-and-Categories
Tuesday-Plenary-Discussion-Mechanics
Tuesday-Breakout-5-Goals-Concerns-and-Principles
Tuesday-Breakout-4-Thresholds-and-Categories
Tuesday-Breakout-4-Goals-Concerns-and-Principles
Tuesday-Breakout-3-Thresholds-and-Categories
Tuesday-Breakout-3-Goals-Concerns-and-Principles
Tuesday-Breakout-2-Thresholds-and-Categories
Tuesday-Breakout-2-Goals-Concerns-and-Principles
Tuesday-Breakout-1-Thresholds-and-Categories
Tuesday-Breakout-1-Goals-Concerns-and-Principles
Thursday-Discussion-Thought-Experiment-3
Thursday-Breakout-4-Thought-Experiment-3
Thursday-Breakout-3-Thought-Experiment-3
Thursday-Breakout-2-Thought-Experiment-3
Thursday-Breakout-1-Thought-Experiment-3
SRMGI-Mechanics-background-paper
SRMGI-March-22-24-Agenda-Final
SRMGI-International-background-paper
SRMGI-background-paper-Thresholds
Instructions-Thought-Experiment-3
Instructions-Thought-Experiment-1-Individual-Country-Focus
Instructions-Addendum-Thought-Experiment-1-Individual-Country-Focus
The following are waiting to be categorised
No._13_-_Upper_Air_Measurements
Design and Management of Sustainable Built Environments
MDX lab results – HAIR (corrupted)
David Lim – Forest Row article – for press. upload
RENSE chemweb lab tests Venice
EU Directive Environmental access to information
Environmental Information Regulations 2004
rolls-royce-emissions-reponse-10-08-16
ejrr_1_16_dieselgate_cop21_and_geoengine
wmo_expert_mtg_phisanulok_2015_report_final
clientearth-clean-air-handbook
Weather Modification by Carbon Dust Absorption of Solar Energy
UK Climate Engineering Dossier 2014 V2 d8
Senegal-SRM-Summary-July-2012-Final
Human Tissue and Rain – Lab Tests 1
Official approval and the burden of proof
11_0175_global-security-roundtable-summary
11_0548-aviation-roundtable-summary
11_0578_hazard-management-roundtable-summary
12_0382_Renewables_Roundtable_summary
12_0382_Water_Roundtable_summary
UK Climate Engineering Dossier 2014 V2 d8
Met_Office_Intercomparison_of_Vaisala_RS41_and_RS92_Radiosondes
A case study of the radiative forcing of persistent contrails evolving into contrail-induced cirrus
Aviation And Chemistry and Transport Processes